"Corporate Integrity Project"" .
Ken Boehm is a far-right-wing Republican lawyer from Colorado (the home of Joseph Coors) while Peter T Flaherty is a long-time Reagan Republican fund-raiser and think-tanker. In 1991 they co-founded the NLPC with Boehm becoming the full-time 'Chairman' and Flaherty the 'President'.
Most of the actual research work at the NLPC is contractd out or done under the direction of Flaherty who is backed by a staff of ten or so, while Boehm is the public face of the organisation. Given the group's enthusiastic use of the lawcourts to harrass liberals, this is a full-time job for all dozen staffers involved.
These two are old friends. Flaherty ran the lobbying group Citizens for Reagan with Ken Boehm as Chairman (later it became Citizens for the Republic ) in the early-to-mid 1980s. This was closely associated with the Funds for a Conservative Majority (Jack Kemp, Paul Dietrich, Ken Boehm) which was a major fund-raiser for the Ronald Reagan for President campaign during the same period.
Both were Californian-based in the early years, then shifted to Washington after Reagan's successful Presidential campaign. Citizens for Reagan later became a major fund-raiser for Ollie North during the Iran Contra scandal.
The NCLP appears to be modelled both on the Citizens for Reagan and on the FCM, in terms of its use of litigation. It attempts to use law suit harrassment as a weapon against the Democrats by attacking their funding sources and annoying their supporters with frivolous charges. The NCLP carries on these grand old GOP traditions.
Like all good PR operation, it is not always glaringly obvious in its partisanship — and it makes some efforts to pretend it is balanced. On the positive side of its activities, it does attack earmarking in Congress (both Republican and Democrat), and it does have the resources (roughly $1m a year) to identify and expose corrupt activities in Democratic organisations and among certain 'liberal congressmen'.
It achieves a fascade of bipartisanship by occasionally slapping the wrist of a few Republican trough-hogs in public, but it doesn't take them to court. The Democrats are usually slapped with a law suit.
When it comes to its trade-mark 'public interest legal suits', the NLPC is almost completely blind to the activities of those on the right. In fact, it is almost as vigorous in defending malfeasance on the right as they are in attacking it on the center or left. There is also a substantial religious slant to the NLPC that makes them blind to any iniquity performed in God's name.
In recent years NLPC seem to have become less-obviously in their lobbying for large corporations (which is the source of at least half their funding). Once they were major supporters of the tobacco industry, but since they were publicly exposed as having taken cigarette dollars for many years, their support for public smoking has diminished. The cigarette industry no longer funds them, but they have developed a fascination for chewing tobacco.
Policies and Programs
Today they are for:
- Ronald McDonald flogging his fattening fries,
- The Smokeless Tobacco industry,
- The energy industry.
- The Republican party and George W Bush.
- God and his representatives on earth, provided they vote Republican
They are/were against (in rough order of precendence):
- Liberals and the 'liberal media'
- Hillary Clinton and health care reform
- Federal Electoral Commision's perceived 'slackness'
- Presidents Clinton and Obama, and their puppet-master Satan
- Democrat Party leadership - especially Nancy Peolosi
- George Soros and billionairres who don't vote Republican
- Legal Services Corporation and legal aid to the poor
- Climate 'doomsayers'
- people who think tobacco chewing is as bad as smoking
- funding of Rev Al Sharpton's Democratic presidential campaign (justified)
- Freddy Mac and Fannie Mae giving Jesse Jackson's fundraiser (probably justified)
- regulations against tobacco smoking
During the Reagan Administration Boehm served as Counsel to the Board of Directors of the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) , the federal government program which ostensively provides legal assistance to the poor. However, his activities were all aimed at gutting the program. (He failed.)
Boehm now appears regularly on the program Conservative Roundtable with Howard Phillips , another Republican apparatchik who also specialised in attacking the LSC. Boehm has also taken on the role of climate sceptic, attacking a 60 Minutes special "Dire Predictions on Global Warming" as "unilateral" and 'misleading" and questioning the show's motivations for allowing such a piece to air. He is clearly an expert on this form of media distoriton ... so his views deserve respect!
Peter Flaherty co-hosted a NET Capitol Watch program attacking tobacco regulation, and he shared both his media interest and financial base with Boehm who was also a radio talkback host and is a regular on PBS. The NCLC was well funded by the tobacco industry to promote their various causes. Now after the exposure of the dangers of smoking and the chicaneries of the cigarette industry, he now defends smokeless tobacco vigorously.
Hillary and the FEC
NLPC was a plaintiff in the successful 1993 lawsuit to open the meetings and records of Hillary Rodham Clinton's health care task force. Peter Flaherty then wrote a book in 1995 entitled The First Lady: A Comprehensive View of Hillary Rodham Clinton which is about as dispassionate and fair-minded as you would expect from an avid Republican moralist.
But despite the focus of their hatred on the Clintons and the liberals, the main activity of the NLPC is to file suit with the Federal Electoral Commission (FEC). There must be a whole division of the FEC fully devoted to examining the claims laid against Democrats and their supporters by the NLPC.
More recently, in October 2004, the organization accused billionaire George Soros of election law violation. Soros had undertaken a media and speaking tour in some swing states during which he called for the defeat of President Bush. His appearances coincided with two-page newspaper ads and mass mailings to voters with the same theme.
The NLPC alleged that Soros 'may have made illegal expenditures because he failed to fully disclose expenses related to his swing-state speaking tour.' Also named as respondents in the complaint were Fenton Communications (a liberal/environmentally-inclined PR organisation) which assisted Soros, and two nonprofit organizations that hosted Soros speeches.
[See the excellent Wikipedia entry. There is little point in us duplicating it.]
1984–88: Peter T Flaherty served as Chairman of the lobbying group Citizens for Reagan .
1991: Ken Boehm who was the Chairman of Citizens for Reagan, co-founded the National Legal and Policy Institute with Peter Flaherty. Boehm took the title of Chairman, while Flaherty became President. Richard Mellon Sciafe gave the NLPC $100,000
1993: NLPC was a plaintiff in the successful 1993 lawsuit to open the meetings and records of Hillary Rodham Clinton's health-care task force which had been conductd in private (to avoid Republican attacks while the policy was being formulated).
1994 Oct: Flaherty became co-host of National Empowerment Television (NET)'s (Paul Weyrich's) Capitol Watch program which was funded by Philip Morris to attack tobacco regulations.
1995 Jan 17: Richardson Ziebart Consulting memo to RJR headed Ideas for Working with National Legal and Policy Center [FACA is the act that allows the Dept of Health to form advisory committees] The NLPC is being used as an attack-dog, trying to challenge the Interagency Committee on Smoking and Health by using the FACA.
The memo makes it clear that Peter Flaherty and Ken Boehm are trying to 'get' Kessler.
"Peter and Ken believe that Kessler's action probably violated Federal guidelines relating to establishing policy with private groups and individuals without proper public debate.
Our next step is to get back together with them in the next week or so to plot out a specific strategy for further exploring the above issues and other pertinent areas. We believe there is a great opportunity here and will keep you apprised as we progress. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments."
1995: Fall: CATO Institute's Policy Review article by Kenneth F Boehm and Peter T Flaherty, "Legal Disservices Corp: There Are Better Ways to Provide Legal Aid to the Poor,"
1996: publishing a book co-authored by NLPC President Peter Flaherty entitled The First Lady: A Comprehensive View of Hillary Rodham Clinton (Vital Issues Press).Ê http://www.nlpc.org/view.asp?action=viewArticle&aid=60
1996 March: /E Further harrassent of the FDA over an insomnia drug Halcion - dutifully reported in the EPA Newsletter (secretly controlled by Philip Morris)
1996 March 29: Investors Business Daily (a tobacco- and big-business-friendly newspaper, reports on further FOIA harrasment of the FDA "Have FDA officals gone Rogue?"
1996 May 3: Ken Boehm is "chairman" and providing PM with background on FDA staffers and their anti-tobacco meetings. Real spy stuff
1997 Nov 7: The weekly report of Philip Morris Federal Tobacco Team's Washington lobbyist, Beverly McKittrick, reports " "Had lunch with J Carlisle of National Legal and Policy Center."" along with her other scam work on product liability, etc.
[ Note: This is John K Carlisle , who also worked for the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR) run by Amy Moritz Ridenour (described in tobacco documents as "a willing ally".) As with the NLPC, the NCPPR was formed in the 1980s to support the Reagan administration's military adventures in Central America, but by 1997 it was calling itself a "communications and research foundation dedicated to providing free market solutions to today's public policy problems." It ran the tobacco-supported Project 21 association, a conservative African American organization that has been funded by R.J. Reynolds.]
1999 May 4: A Philip Morris contact report is enthusiastic about using the NLPC because the
"NLPC also ran a program called, "FDA Watch." This program monitored David Kessler in the last two years of his term. They round many irregularities at FDA through the heavy use of the Freedom of Information Act. [ie about the Clinton Administration suing the tobacco industry].
This is an effective organization. They sent a letter to Senator Robb opposing the Federal Lawsuit."
1999 May 27: Phillip Morris meeting report says:
The anti-tax group, Citizens Against Unfair Taxation, was represented by Dan Rene. They have been very effective in the past by mailing letters in opposition to the 55-cent hike proposed by President Clinton.
Peter Flaherty, representing Citizens for Reform was also present. CFR is an organization that opposes the growth of government and the like. Like CAUT, Mr. Flaherty has sent letters [for the tobacco industry to congressmen] in the past and has a particular interest in the Federal Lawsuit.
Ken Boehm from the National Legal & Policy Center was also present . He has a keen interest in the FDA as NLPC ran "FDA WATCH" for the last two years of Mr . Kessler's tenure at the FDA . NLPC is also the organization that successfully sued the Health Care Task Force of Mrs. Clinton's.
1999: Aug Article about a law suit in Kentucky for [$194,032.72] in reputed unpaid wages and damages to Mexican workers, NLCP complains that:
" Legal Services Corp., a non-profit group that receives the majority of its funding from the Federal government to provide free and subsidized legal help to the poor, is overstepping its boundaries by aiding Mexican nationals. Ken Boehm of the watchdog group the National Legal and Policy Center points out that the Corp. is violating a provision that requires the organization to represent only those clients who are living in the United States. Boehm said,"They're asking for the world, and they are litigating in a way. . .that's just unethical."
2001 June 19: The NLPC is still being contacted by the tobacco
Field Action Team representatives over a "FDA Education" program
2002 Apr 15: An article by Joseph A D'Agostino:
"The NLPC, a watchdog group, has long trained its fire on another middy-grounded entity, the government-funded Legal Services Corp. (LSC) . The LSC, which is supposed to provide legal assistance to poor people, perennially attracts criticism from conservatives for pursuing left-wing causes and wacky class-action lawsuits paid for with taxpayer money.
"The history of the Legal Services Corp. is a history of failed attempts at reform," NLPC Chairman Ken Boehm testified before a House subcommittee chaired by Rep. Bob Barr (R.-Ga.) on February 28. "Much of the debate in the U.S. House of Representatives in 1973 over pending legislation to establish the Legal Services Corp. dealt with restrictions to prevent a repeat of the political and ideological activities associated with the legal services program which existed under the Office of Economic Opportunity.
"The controversies that have plagued the federal legal services program remain the same. The central criticism has been that activist lawyers have used the program to advance a political and ideological agenda."
Boehm went on to detail how the LSC has circumvented restrictions imposed upon it by Congress in 1996. Among other measures, Congress forbid LSC grantees to take on class-action suits, encourage political activities, or resent aliens not in the country. All 11 members of the LSC's board are up for nomination by the President and confirmation by the Senate, said Boehm. "The real issue with Legal Services is, will it be a Bush board or a Daschle board?" he said. "We would like to see the 1996 reforms enforced, and that means that the President must appoint a board that will enforce them." During the first Bush Administration, "Sen. Kennedy never held a hearing on any of Bush's nominees," he said. "The President kept recess-appointing them."
The NLPC is also a clearinghouse for information on union corruption and sends out periodic reports with comprehensive summaries about the never-ending series of union corruption scandals. A new, potentially huge, scandal is now developing, said Boehm and NLPC President Peter Flaherty. A federal grand jury and the AFL-CIO are investigating transactions by the members of the board of insurance company Ullico, which may have allowed the board members to profit at the expense of the company. At least 12 current or former building trade union presidents are members of the board, and so is AFL-CO President John Sweeney. The potential scandal includes an investment in now-bankrupt Global Crossing.
Part of the problem behind incessant union corruption, said Flaherty, is that unions' disclosure forms are "vague." And, said Boehm, "Unions don't have to use `generally accepted accounting practices,'" as corporations must.
Any criticism of unions by conservatives must include a mention of Communications Workers of America v. Beck, the U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled that Workers cannot be forced to fund unions' political activities. But many union members do not know that, because Beck has never been enforced. "The best way is for Congress to pass a statute, but that isn't going to happen," said Flaherty. Essentially, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) must enforce the decision — something that only the President could trigger with good appointments.
Right now, NLPC is helping the get — Jesse-Jackson campaign. "Jackson's approach is akin to yakuza and other classic protection rackets: You hand over money, or we'll carry out our threat," Flaherty wrote in a September 2001 article. "His method of retaliation? Playing the race card." "We've heard talk of a RICO suit,"" said Boehm. "We could see how it might qualify. We even know of a black minister who says he was sold out by Jackson."
2002–03: The NLPC was obviously now 'friendly' with the Smokeleass Tobacco Council,
2003 Sep 22: After years of taking Philip Morris's silver, the NLPC has had a change of heart about regulation — but it is caught up in a quandry: Flaherty now has to play Mr Clean — the anti-Big Tobacco activist.
Republicans and tobacco-state lawmakers, who in the past beat back plans to regulate tobacco products, are joining forces with the biggest cigarette manufacturer in supporting new strict oversight of the industry. "This is clearly a very different kind of momentum than what we've had before," said Wendy Selig, a lobbyist for the American Cancer Society. The NLPC is now the farmers friend - promoting a government buyout of tobacco quotas. (Chewing tobacco doesn't use much)
A Senate committee on Thursday is expected to consider a tobacco regulation bill that would give the Food and Drug Administration new authority to regulate tobacco. Tobacco-state lawmakers are backing such a measure in exchange for financial help for cash-strapped tobacco farmers. Republicans now see that Philip Morris USA, a top party contributor and maker of Marlboro cigarettes, has reversed course and favors regulation.
"Peter Flaherty, President of the National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) , today criticized an emerging deal on Capitol Hill that would provide tobacco growers a one-time payout between $13 billion and $16 billion, while at the same time bringing tobacco products under the jurisdiction of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Pursuant to the deal orchestrated by Philip Morris lobbyists, tobacco state legislators would drop their longstanding opposition to FDA oversight of tobacco, if anti-tobacco legislators would support the bailout.
Flaherty said. "Let me explain this unholy alliance. After years of fighting FDA oversight, Philip Morris, the dominant tobacco manufacturer, now sees the proposed FDA advertising and marketing rules as a useful tool to punish its competitors and increase its market share. This is a classic case of a big company manipulating government regulation to squeeze its competitors.
"Money from a quota buyout would enable older farmers to retire. Younger farmers, many of whom lease quotas, could use the buyout to pay off debts and switch crops, if they can find profitable alternatives. Both outcomes would serve public purposes well."
2004 Dec 24: A Denver Business Journal article is healined: "Questions HHS Stance On Banning All Tobacco Use."
Ken Boehm, chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, questioned the rationale of the US Department of Health and Human Services' ban on the use of all tobacco products on its campuses starting January 1, because the measure implies that smokeless products pose the same health risks as cigarettes, and ignores a growing body of scientific research about smokeless tobacco.
2004 Mar: Ken Boehm of the National Legal & Policy Center (NLPC) filed a request under the Data Quality Act (DQA) for correction of a document from the National Institute of Aging (NIA) that contained what they said was misinformation regarding the relative risks of Smokeless Tobacco versus cigarettes.
The request resulted in a change of wording from the original text:
"Some people think ST (chewing tobacco and snuff), pipes, and cigars are safer than cigarettes. They are not." The revised wording from NIA was:
"Some people think ST (chewing tobacco and snuff), pipes, and cigars are safe. They are not."
The claim that Smokelss Tpbacco products are not "safe" is a tactic that can be traced back to the 1986 Comprehensive Smokeless Tobacco Education Act, which required as one-of-three warnings on all Smokeless Tobacco products: "This product is not a safe alternative to cigarettes." http://toquesnuff.blogspot.com/
2005 Sep 22: They seem to be attacking the National Institute for Aging again.
In response to a formal complaint lodged by the National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) of Virginia on March 16th, the National Institute of Aging (NIA) in Wisconsin sent a letter on June 29th to the NLPC stating that the institute has agreed to revise its Age Page website as well as printed literature entitled Smoking : Its never too late to stop. The NLPC had accused the NIA of disseminating inaccurate information regarding the relative risks of smokeless tobacco products and violaring the Data Quality Act.
2009 Feb 3: Report: "The center's nonprofit status allows it to keep its funding private. Flaherty wouldn't disclose his donor list but acknowledged that the biggest source of funds comes from foundations associated with Richard Mellon Scaife , the billionaire heir to the Mellon fortune and well-known supporter of conservative public policy organizations.
Scaife's donations make up less than 10 percent of the center's $1.4 million annual budget, with the lion's share of the rest coming from individuals and averaging $200, Flaherty said.
[He also claims to feed information into the media via a special channel to journalists at Murdoch's New York Post]
[Some of these hot-links should work]
• Kenneth Boehm
• Peter Flaherty
• Michael J Nelson
• John K Carlisle
• National Empowerment Television
• National Center for Public Policy Research
• Citizens for Reagan
• Fund for a Conservative Majority
• Council for National Policy
• Richadson Ziebart Consulting